CANADA is a business
It's time that someone has the vision like Stephen Harper to start treating Canada as a business. We are a multi-billion dollar corporation that needs accountability. We've seen what happens when we allow accountability to slip and companies like Enron and WorldCom steal billions and finanically ruin thousands of lives. The Liberal brand of politics lead to a culture of entitlement, not much different than how Conrad Black treated his business empire.
We all know that it is hard to get the absolute best person to run in each riding. Every party has MP's that don't have the greatest skills for the job. When a party can look outside it's party and recognize the talents(ie. PHD's , former executives, etc) of another MP from another party; it's good business sense. It's about finding the right mix of politics and business talent to make a good government. We've seen what happens when bad politics get mixed into business. Money disappears or is poorly spent. ie. Adscam and the gun registry.
I'm fully behind the political decisions that Stephen Harper made on cabinet day. His decisions made good business sense for running this great nation. People should be able to see the difference and see how the interaction of politics and business occur in their own company. Nepotism is politics.
We all know that it is hard to get the absolute best person to run in each riding. Every party has MP's that don't have the greatest skills for the job. When a party can look outside it's party and recognize the talents(ie. PHD's , former executives, etc) of another MP from another party; it's good business sense. It's about finding the right mix of politics and business talent to make a good government. We've seen what happens when bad politics get mixed into business. Money disappears or is poorly spent. ie. Adscam and the gun registry.
I'm fully behind the political decisions that Stephen Harper made on cabinet day. His decisions made good business sense for running this great nation. People should be able to see the difference and see how the interaction of politics and business occur in their own company. Nepotism is politics.
posted by Fighting for Democracy at 7:46 AM
2 Comments:
Harper’s One-Man-Band, and Pretzel Tories.
So, a little time has passed, and Harper’s daring moves to impress the electorate with his political acumen have now sunk in a bit. Reaction across the country to his cabinet appointments – and abandonment of principles espoused during the election – have varied from sheer disbelief, to shock, to amusement. Never has a Canadian politician fallen so far so fast. Usually it takes time for power to corrupt, but Mr. Harper is a man in a hurry.
Many Tories have had to swallow their tongues and bend themselves into pretzels defending the indefensible. Some MPs have said they fear going back to their ridings because they will have to explain to their supporters how the Harper crew did a sudden U-turn on the accountability issue, which, after all, was the Tory strong point in the election. Harper ran as Mr. Clean, and painted Martin as Mr. Corruption at every opportunity he had.
Even the rightwing press is stunned and disappointed.
Examples of press reaction:
The Vancouver Sun:
“"I expected some of the superficial criticism I've seen," Mr. Harper told The Vancouver Sun in an interview. "But I think once people sit back and reflect, they'll understand that this is in the best interests of not just British Columbia but frankly of good government." Mr. Harper referred to his statements on Monday, when he said he recruited Mr. Emerson to Cabinet to give Vancouver -- which didn't elect a Tory MP in five city ridings -- a voice in Cabinet. He used the same rationale to explain why he appointed Tory national campaign co-chairman Michael Fortier, a Montreal businessman, to the Senate and as Minister of Public Works. Montreal, like Vancouver, did not elect a government MP. "I think I was clear what I did and why I did it," Mr. Harper said yesterday.
The Calgary Sun – Roy Clancy:
“Stephen Harper must be breathing a sigh of relief today. Just minutes after being sworn in as prime minister, he relieved himself of one of the biggest burdens he had carried into the job. No longer must he live up to the impossible standard of political purity and ethical integrity saddled upon him by a naive electorate. ...But as widespread moans of anger illustrate, many Canadians took Harper seriously when he promised Monday to "begin a new chapter for Canada." No wonder they were disappointed when they learned within moments that this new chapter looks a lot like the old one. ...Harper's pragmatic moves may not have violated the letter of his promises to change the way government is run, but they shattered the spirit. .... Monday's manoeuvres quickly lowered the bar when it comes to public expectations of this new regime.“
The Calgary Sun - Rick Bell:
“See the Tories wriggle. Wriggle, Tories, wriggle. Ah yes, one party's turncoat is another party's principled politician. No anger now. No demands to step down and face the voters now. No nasty name-calling now. No sympathy for the poor electors of the riding of the quisling now. ... The trouble with talking about the moral high ground is you actually have to walk on it or, like the kid standing by the broken window after throwing the snowball, insist without shame you've done nothing wrong. ... So the rationalizations flow, the lame explanations are exhaled into the hot air and only those who have drunk the Conservative Kool-Aid will follow as good old ideological ants.”
So, what lessons can be taken from Harper’s first exercise of Prime Ministerial power? Here are a few for you to ponder:
• Just as it is unfair to accuse every Republican of having the same moral vacuity that President Bush has displayed, so too is it unfair to say that all Conservatives – and all voters who voted for the Tories – lack good moral and political judgment. It is very clear that there are a lot of people who voted Tory because they sincerely believed that it was time for the Liberals to mend their house, and for another party to bring in some anti-corruption measures. These people still have high standards; they are as bewildered by the events of this week as others are.
• Harper obviously believes he is above trifling things like having to take the feelings of others into consideration. This exercise of Prime Ministerial power shows that he will think things through – apparently mostly on his own – and then decide on the best way forward. If he explains his thought process, it is obvious to him that voters will then understand why he is right, and fall into line. There is a word for this: paternalism. Harper shows clear signs of seeing himself as the Big Wise Daddy of Canadian politics. His use of the word “superficial” to describe the reaction of others to his crass abandonment of some of the major planks of his election platform illustrates this very clearly.
• Harper is focused on winning a majority in the next election, to happen within 18 months. Everything he will do or say is geared to that. If lesser mortals within his own party do not understand this, that is their problem. They must suck it up and stay in line. Big Daddy knows best.
• Harper does not believe in a democratic party for the Tory government. It is his way or the highway (witness Stronach). This is perhaps the most worrisome aspect for many Tories: did they realize they were electing a dictator rather than the leader of a parliamentary party fashioned along the lines of a Westminster democracy? How many more decisions will be made by The Leader, and rammed down the throats of the caucus? And how can Canadians expect such decisions to be the best, if they are not tested by vigorous debate within the governing party before being made?
If Harper continues in the same vein for the next 12 months, expect him to join the ranks of the Clarks, Campbells and Martins as a short-lived blip on the Canadian political firmament.
curiositykilledthecat said
"• Harper does not believe in a democratic party for the Tory government. It is his way or the highway (witness Stronach). This is perhaps the most worrisome aspect for many Tories: did they realize they were electing a dictator rather than the leader of a parliamentary party fashioned along the lines of a Westminster democracy?"
Are you disappointed in the political process to recruit MP's or are you trying to defend a corrupt Liberal government.
To accuse someone of being a dictator when he hasn't been in control of government for more than a couple of days is ludicris. He made 2 appointments purely on representation of areas of Canada that had no representation.
I see that the premier of BC welcomed the move. I see the Montreal press liked the move. These people see the need to have local experienced talent within a federal government.
Once you get over the anger and actually start to watch this government in progress over a few months, then perhaps you might be able to comment further without making a fool of yourself.
Post a Comment
<< Home